http://curricublog.org/2006/10/19/rawls-creationism/ Tony Whitson's blog on curriculum-related matters Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:45:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 http://curricublog.org/2006/10/19/rawls-creationism/#comment-30 truth machine Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:33:22 +0000 http://curricublog.wordpress.com/2006/10/19/rawls-creationism/#comment-30 I suppose it's "clever" to ignore the facts, such as that Scopes was a matter of being forced *not* to teach something (despite it being scientific), while Kitzmiller was a matter of being forced *to* teach something (despite it being unscientific). I suppose it’s “clever” to ignore the facts, such as that Scopes was a matter of being forced *not* to teach something (despite it being scientific), while Kitzmiller was a matter of being forced *to* teach something (despite it being unscientific).

]]> http://curricublog.org/2006/10/19/rawls-creationism/#comment-18 A Rawlsian argument against ID in public schools « Tony’s curricublog Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:32:34 +0000 http://curricublog.wordpress.com/2006/10/19/rawls-creationism/#comment-18 [...] One point of interests is the White Paper’s presentation of a Rawlsian argument against teaching Intelligent Design in public schools, which most people would find more congenial to Rawls than the “Rawlsian” argument for including ID, which has been discussed in an earlier post on this blog. [...] [...] One point of interests is the White Paper’s presentation of a Rawlsian argument against teaching Intelligent Design in public schools, which most people would find more congenial to Rawls than the “Rawlsian” argument for including ID, which has been discussed in an earlier post on this blog. [...]

]]>